The Relationship between Online Interaction and Academic Performance of Distance E-Learners in a Nigerian University


Analysis, Academic Performance, Influence, and Distance E-Learners.

How to Cite

Aboderin, O. S., & Laleye, A. (2019). The Relationship between Online Interaction and Academic Performance of Distance E-Learners in a Nigerian University. American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 2(1), 25-33.


Distance e-learners are expected to participate in an e-learning environment and interact with the content, colleagues and facilitators through distance education technologies. Learning environment goes a long way to determine student’s academic performance. Hence, this study tends to find out relationship between online interaction and distance e-learners. The purpose of the study was to analyze the correlation that exists between learner-content-interaction (LCI), learner-learner-interaction (LLI) and learner-instructor-interaction (LII) and academic performance of distance e-learners in a Nigerian university. Two research questions were designed to guide the study.  A descriptive design of survey type was adopted for the study and a questionnaire was used to collect the quantitative data. The study was conducted in four selected study centres of National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) and a total of 1,025 participants completed the survey-based questionnaire. The researchers used Spearman’s correlation to determine if correlation exists on each type of interaction. The findings of this study revealed that learner-learner-interaction was the only factor that was significant(r = .066, p-value = .034), with very small weak correlation out of the three types of interactions discussed in this study. Findings also revealed that all the three types of interactions were significant (LCI, r= .121** p=0.009; LII, r=.108*, p=0.018; LLI, r = .105*, p = 0.023) for female distance e-learners but none was significant for male distance e-learners.Based on the findings of the research, recommendations have been made which will assist Nigerian university policy makers and course developers with a view to improving the academic performance of distance e-learners.


Algahtani, A. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia from Male Students' Perceptions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.School of Education,University of Durham.

Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-González, M. Á., & Hernández-García, Á. (2014). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in human behavior, 31(2014), 542-550.

Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2007). The importance of participant interaction in online environments. Decision support systems, 43(3), 853-865.

Alstete, J. W., & Beutell, N. J. (2004). Performance indicators in online distance learning courses: a study of management education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 6-14.

Becta, 2008, How do Boys and Girls Differ in their use of ICT?. Becta, leading next generation learning.

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of educational research, 79(3), 1243-1289.

Chinyamurindi, W. & Shava, H., (2015). An Investigation into e-learning Acceptance and Gender Amongst Final Year Students’, South African Journal of Information Management 17(1).

Coldwell, J., Craig, A., Paterson, T., & Mustard, J. (2008). Online students: Relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 6(1), 19-30.

Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & Education, 54(2), 350-359.

Diedrich, J. L. (2010). Motivating Students Using Positive Reinforcement.Education and Human Development Master's Theses'9. State University of New York College at Brockport The College at Brockport.

Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do gender and race matter? Explaining the relationship between sports participation and achievement. Sociological Spectrum, 25(2), 177-195.

Fink, M. L. (2007). Peer interaction in university-level distance education. Doctoral dissertation,University of Toledo.

Funmilayo D. C. (2013). Gender Differences in the use of Academic Resources: the Case of FUTA Library. International Journal of Library and Information Science.5(8), 256-261, September, 2013.

Gargallo-Castel A., Esteban-salvador I., Pérez-Sanz J. (2010). Impact of Gender in Adopting and Using ICTs Spain. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 5(3) Santiago

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1, 113-127.

Gutierrez, M. T. E., A. C. M. (2007). Online learners’ interactions and characteristics affecting satisfaction and academic performance. A Philippines case study.

Horvat J., Oreski D. and Markic D. (2011). Gender Differences in the Internet Usage Among Postgraduate Students, Proceedings of the ITI 2011 33rd Int. Conf. on Information Technology Interfaces.

Ikolo V. E. and Okiy R. B. (2012). Gender Differences in Computer Literacy Among Clinical Medical Students in Selected Southern Nigerian Universities”.Library philosophy and practice, 2012.

Knoell, C. M. (2012). The role of the student-teacher relationship in the lives of fifth graders: a mixed methods analysis: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Kolloff, M. A. (2011). Strategies for effective student/student interaction in online courses. Paper presented at the 17 Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, U. SA.

Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282.

KunhiMohamed, B. B. V. (2012). Student participation and grade performance in an undergraduate online learning environment. Colorado State University.

Martínez‐Caro, E. (2011). Factors affecting effectiveness in e‐learning: An analysis in production management courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 19(3), 572-581.

Mahmood K. (2009). Gender, subject and degree differences in university students’ access, use and attitudes towards information and communication technology (ICT)”. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2009, 5(3), 206-216.

Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2010). Effective teaching: Research and practice. London: Paul Chapman.

Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185-199.

Neslihan,ER, & Mustapha,ER. (2016). The Effects of Student-Content Interaction on Academic Performance in Distance-Learning Courses. International Journal on New Trends in Education & their Implications (IJONTE), 7(3), 60-68.

Nugent, T. T. (2009). The impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement: University of Central Florida.

Nur-Mustafa. M., (2014). The Effects of Gender Differences in ICT Application: Bridging the Gap of Knowledge and Skills Among Teachers. Aust. J. Basic & appl. Sci., 8(10), 81-86, 2014.

Odufuwa, F. (2012). Understanding what is happening in ICT in Nigeria. A supply and demand side analysis of the ICT sector. Evidence for ICT Policy Action Policy Paper 6, 2012.

Onasanya S, A., Ayelaagbe, S, O., Laleye A, M. (2015). Mobile Phones and Adult Education in Nigeria: Prospects and Future Challenges. New Media and Mass Communication. ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online) Vol 8, 2012.

Ramos, C., & Yudko, E. (2008). “Hits”(not “discussion posts”) predict student success in online courses: a double cross-validation study. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 50(4), 1174-1182.

Rugendo, C. (2014). Influence of study habits and demographic variables on academic performance: The case of Bachelor of Education (Arts) Students. University of NairobiI, Kenya. Doctoral Dissertation.

Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2).

Shih, P.-C., Martínez-Molina, A., & Muñoz, D. (2008). The navigation experience in an online activity: Related variables to user satisfaction. Paper presented at the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology.

Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 47.

Tirri, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2013). Interaction in educational domains: Springer Science & Business Media.

Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The internet and higher education, 10(1), 15-25.

Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Download data is not yet available.