Vol 1 No 2 (2019)
Articles

Social Cohesion and Cultural Diversity in Contemporary Britain: Impossible Mission!

Hassen Zriba
Assistant Professor ,University of Gafsa, Tunisia
Published June 17, 2019
Keywords
  • Social Cohesion, Diversity, British Ethnic Minorities, Race.
How to Cite
Zriba, H. (2019). Social Cohesion and Cultural Diversity in Contemporary Britain: Impossible Mission!. American International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2), 17-28. Retrieved from http://www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijhass/article/view/92

Abstract

In contemporary multicultural Britain, the concept of social cohesion has been a pressing priority for not only politicians and sociologists but also for the various British ethnic minorities. Race riots like those of 2001 in Northern Britain and the events of 7/7 in London (2005) put into question the allegiances of different British ethnic populations. They equally shed light on the real or perceived lack of social and cultural communication between the established British host population and the British ethnic and immigrant communities. Hence, social cohesion came to the fore as the new jargon of governance in contemporary Britain.This article analyzes on the concept of social cohesion and its applicability within an officially declared multicultural community like that of Great Britain. The concept will be reviewed, defined and approached from different liberal political perspectives (Robert Dahl’s pluralist approach and Arend Lijphart’s consociationalism to the more recent Will Kymlicka’s group-differentiated citizenship) while paying special attention to the British context. Bhikhu Parekh’s conception of the different theoretical approaches to the issue of social cohesion that are pertinent to liberal capitalist societies in general and the British context, in particular, is investigated. The aim of this study is to highlight the complexity of the normative accounts of the political scientists regarding the challenges that face multicultural Britain in coming to terms with its endeavour of creating “unity within diversity”.  The 2002 White Paper and security speech of David Cameron (2011) political discourses are analyzed and evaluated to decipher how they understood national identity in relation to cultural diversity and social cohesion. 

 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3376484

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bernard, P. (2000) Social Cohesion: A Dialectical Critique of a Quasi-Concept? SRA. Strategic Research and Analysis, Department of Canadian Heritage, Ottawa: English translation of Bernard, Paul (1999) “La cohésion sociale: critique dialectique d’un quasi concept,” Lien social et politique – RIAC: numéro 41, printemps 1999: 47-59.
  2. Blunkett, D. (2002) Secure Borders, Safe Haven. White Paper. Home Office, London.
  3. Bollen, K and Hoyele, R. (1990) “Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination”, Social Forces, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 479-504, published by University of North Carolina Press.
  4. Brown, C. (2001) “'If we want social cohesion we need a sense of identity'” Sunday, 9 December.
  5. Cameron, D. (2011)” PM's speech at Munich Security Conference” (https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-at-munich-security-conference), accessed on 30 May 2016.
  6. Cantle, T. (2001) Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review Team, London: Home Office.
  7. Clarke, T. (2002) Report of the Burnley Task Force. Burnley: Burnley Local Council.
  8. Comte, A. (1976) Auguste Comte: The Foundation of Sociology, Michigan: Nelson Edition, University of Michigan.
  9. Dahl, R. (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Denham, J. (2002) Building Cohesive Communities: A Report of the Ministerial Group on Public Order and Community Cohesion, London: Home Office.
  11. Dunleavy, P. (1981) “Alternative theories of liberal democratic politics: the pluralist-Marxist debate in the 1980’s” in Potter, D et al. (1981) Society and Social Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd: London.
  12. Durkeim, E. (1964) The Division of Labour in Society, Free Press: New York.
  13. Eisenber, A. (2002) “‘Pluralism, Consociationalism, Group-Differentiated Citizenship and the Problem of Social Cohesion”. University of Victoria: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  14. (http://www2.arts.ubc.ca/cresp/plurpap.pdf) (Accessed on 10/01/2008)
  15. Gordon, P. (1990) “A Dirty War: The New Right and Local Authority Anti-Racism”, in Ball, W. and Solomos, J. Race and Local Politics, London: Macmillan.
  16. Jenson, J. (1998) Mapping Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research (Ottawa: CPRN F-03).
  17. (http://www.cprn.org/documents/15723_en.pdf), accessed on 13/05/2008.
  18. Kundnani, A. (2001)“From Oldham to Bradford: the violence of the violated”, in Race and Class, 43, 2: 105-131: Institute of Race Relations.
  19. Kundnani, A. (2002)“ The death of multiculturalism” Institute of Race Relations. (http://www.irr.org.uk/news/the-death-of-multiculturalism/), accessed on 12 April 2016.
  20. Kymlicka, W.( 1989) Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Kymlicka, W. (1995)Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Lester, A. (1998) “From Legislation to Integration” in Blackstone, T., Parekh, B. and Sanders, P., Race Relations in Britain: a developing agenda. London: Routledge.
  23. Lijphart, A. (1971) “Cultural Diversity and Political Integration,” Canadian Journal of Political Science IV:1 (March) 1-14.
  24. Lijphart, A. (2004) “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies”, Journal of Democracy, Volume 15, Number 2, pp 96-109.
  25. Lijphart, A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
  26. Malik, K. (2001) “The trouble with multiculturalism”. Spiked-Politics Online,
  27. (http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/00000002D35E.htm) Accessed on 02/06/2008.
  28. Malik, K. (2002) “Against multiculturalism », New Humanist
  29. (http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/against_mc.html). Accessed on 15/8/2008.
  30. Malik, K. (2006) “multiculturalism and the road to terror”, handelsblatt, 3 January (http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/muslims_handelsblatt.html) accessed on 20/11/2008.
  31. Mann, M. (1981) “The Social Cohesion of Liberal democracy” in Potter, D et al (1981). Society and Social Sciences, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
  32. Mizruchi, M. (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
  33. Moody, J. White, D. (2003) “Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 68, No. 1. (Feb. 2003), pp. 103-127.
  34. Ouseley, H. (2001) Community Pride not prejudice, Bradford: Bradford Vision.
  35. Parekh, B. (2000a) 'Defining British national identity', Political Quarterly, 71, pp. 4-14.
  36. Parekh, B. (Ed) (2000c) The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, London: The Runnymede Trust.
  37. Parsons, T. (1971) The System of Modern Societies, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  38. Pilkington, A. (2003) Racial Disadvantage and Ethnic Diversity in Britain, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Ritchie, D. (2001) Oldham Independent Review, Oldham: Oldham Local Council.
  40. Shils, E. (1981) “Center and periphery” in Potter, D et al (1981). Society and Social Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd: London.
  41. Stanley, D. (2003) “What Do We Know about Social Cohesion: The Research Perspective of the Federal Government’s Social Cohesion Research Network”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol.28 No. 1, Special Issue on Social Cohesion in Canada. (Winter, 2003), pp. 5-17.
  42. Weber, M. (1997) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York: Free Press.
  43. Worley, C. (2005) ‘It’s not about race. It’s about the community’: New Labour and ‘community cohesion’, Critical Social Policy Ltd 0261–0183 85 Vol. 25(4): 483–496; London: Sage Publications.
  44. Yuval-Davis, N. (2004) “Borders, Boundaries and the Politics of belonging” in May, S., Modood T., and Squires, J. Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights, London: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Zriba, H.(2014) “Representation of “Ethnic Residential Segregation” in British Post-2001 Race Riots National Reports”, European Journal of Academic Essays 1(3): 20-27.